Laferrai is still my favourite
And I believe that it well kill the rimac on the track
Ferrari LaFerrari vs Rimac Nevera
| Category | Ferrari LaFerrari | Rimac Nevera |
|---|---|---|
| Max power (ps / bhp) | 963 / 950 | 1941 / 1914 |
| Max torque (Nm / lb-ft) | 900 / 664 | 2299 / 1696 |
| Curb weight (kg / lb) | 1606 / 3541 | 2150 / 4740 |
| Power / tonne (ps / bhp) | 600 / 591 | 903 / 890 |
Acceleration
| Speed & distance | Ferrari LaFerrari | Rimac Nevera |
|---|---|---|
| 0 - 100 kph | 2.7 s | 1.8 s |
| 0 - 200 kph | 6.9 s | 4.4 s |
| 0 - 300 kph | 15.0 s | 9.2 s |
| 0 - 60 mph | 2.4 s | 1.7 s |
| 0 - 100 mph | 4.7 s | 3.2 s |
| 0 - 120 mph | 6.4 s | 4.2 s |
| 0 - 130 mph | 7.4 s | 4.8 s |
| Est. 0 - 200 mph | 19.8 s | 10.9 s |
| Est. 1/8 mile | 6.9 s @ 122.4 mph | 5.4 s |
| 1/4 mile | 9.7 s @ 149.1 mph | 8.2 s |
| Est. 1/2 mile | 15.8 s @ 183.3 mph | 12.8 s |
General performance
| Category | Ferrari LaFerrari | Rimac Nevera |
|---|---|---|
| Top speed | 355 kph (221 mph) | 415 kph (258 mph) |
| Est. max acceleration | 1.04 g (10 m/s²) | 1.52 g (15 m/s²) |
| 100 kph - 0 | 37 m (121 ft) | 29 m (95 ft) |
| 70 mph - 0 | 41 m (136 ft) | 43 m (141 ft) |
Summary
| Category | Ferrari LaFerrari | Rimac Nevera |
|---|---|---|
| Track Performance | 0 | 0 |
| Straight line speed | 40 | 100 |
| Overall | 40 | 100 |
Verdict
Nevera is the fastest by a huge margin.
This comparison has been viewed 1.4k times.
Acceleration graph
Jehad 5y ago
Cocobe 5y ago
For just 1 lap, I doubt it. The rimac would absolutely destroy it out of the corners. Even if overheating was an issue, the Rimac could afford to let off the accelerator for like 2-3 seconds before a straight and it would still arrive considerably sooner at the end of each straight
