@fastestlaps please combind these cars:
https://fastestlaps.com/models/amc-amx-go-package
and change the power to 320 PS / 576 Nm
AMC AMX specs
Car type | Coupe |
Curb weight | 1421 kg (3133 lbs) |
Dimensions | 4.34 m (171 in) long, 1.75 m (69 in) wide, 1.27 m (50 in) high |
Wheelbase | 2.38 m (94 in) |
Introduced | 1968 |
Origin country | United States |
Views | 6.7k |
Submitted by | jds |
Performance
0 - 100 kph | 6.5 s |
0 - 30 mph | 2.9 s |
0 - 60 mph | 6.9 s |
1/4 mile | 14.7 s |
Top speed | 176 kph (109 mph) |
60 mph - 0 | 36 m (119 ft) |
Powertrain specs
Engine type | V8 |
Displacement | 6.4 l (391 ci) |
Power | 320 ps (316 bhp / 235 kw) @ 4600 rpm |
Torque | 576 Nm (425 lb-ft) @ 3200 rpm |
Power / liter | 50 ps (49 hp) |
Power / weight | 225 ps (222 bhp) / t |
Torque / weight | 405 Nm (299 lb-ft) / t |
Transmission | 4 speed manual |
Layout | front engine, rear wheel drive |
AMX competition
Hoppelmoppel123 2y ago
Viking 12y ago
@Fangio Man
Most cars in the sixties had only four speed manuals (or three speed automatics), and they were geared for acceleration. They typically ran out of rpm and hit the redline around 110 or 115 mph. If they had developed five speed manuals back then, they could have had a higher top speed. Another issue with cars from the sixties in the U.S. is that the quoted horsepower is not to be trusted. SAE gross ratings just weren't reliable, and SAE net didn't get used until 1971 to 1972 depending on manufacturer.
Fangio Man 12y ago
176 kph?
Is that correct?
I mean, this car has over 300 horses and is not very heavy, also I can not imagine its aerodynamic is that bad...